On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 06:01:59PM -0700, David Conrad <d...@virtualized.org> wrote a message of 70 lines which said:
> My gut feeling is that this is a process failure, but will admit > that the whole question is quite unclear given the continuing > uncertainty about the process described in 6761. There is no uncertainty. We have a process (RFC 6761) with its strenghths and weaknesses. Some people thought it would be a good idea to reopen the debate, this was the mistake. We should have used RFC 6761, period. (Which does not prevent to work on a possible 6761-bis but closing de facto the registry, pending this work, was a big error, leading to things like slealth registration, as in RFC 7788.) > Why does the fact that there are actual people to manage something > matter? Who manages 10.in-addr.arpa? % dig +short SOA 10.in-addr.arpa prisoner.iana.org. hostmaster.root-servers.org. 2002040800 1800 900 604800 604800 It seems to be IANA :-) _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
