> On Apr 25, 2016, at 3:31 AM, Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzme...@nic.fr> wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 08:18:35AM +0200, > Patrik Fältström <p...@frobbit.se> wrote > a message of 36 lines which said: > >> Either .HOME should not have been mentioned, or it should be added >> to the registry. > > I fully agree it should have used the RFC 6761 framework. Unfortunately, > it is closed de facto <https://www.ietf.org/blog/2015/09/onion/> So, > the Homenet people really had no choice.
Of course they had choices. Now, I’m a bit concerned justifications like the one above could set a dangerous precedent. I’m perfectly willing to accept there was no malice in that particular case, and it was a “process failure”. We all make mistake, as individuals or as organizations. That’s human nature. The real question is, how do we deal with those mistakes? Alain, speaking solely as myself, not on behalf of my employers, past, present or future.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
