On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 12:20:40PM +1100, Mark Andrews wrote: > It's more that the registry failed to scoop up all the old definitions.
Perhaps. The documentation I could find for chaosnet is pretty thin, and STD 13 is pretty clear that A records are only defined for IN. I'm not really interested in figuring out who is to blame, though. I'm more worried that we have this quite old example sitting there festering, and even it isn't handled right in the registries. What hope does a new class have? Best regards, A -- Andrew Sullivan a...@anvilwalrusden.com _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
