Dear colleagues, I've submitted a draft about the general lack of utility of DNS classes. I am not requesting DNSOP adoption, but I'd welcome any comments you might have.
Best regards, A ----- Forwarded message from internet-dra...@ietf.org ----- Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2016 06:30:29 -0800 From: internet-dra...@ietf.org To: Andrew Sullivan <asulli...@dyn.com> Subject: New Version Notification for draft-sullivan-dns-class-useless-01.txt A new version of I-D, draft-sullivan-dns-class-useless-01.txt has been successfully submitted by Andrew Sullivan and posted to the IETF repository. Name: draft-sullivan-dns-class-useless Revision: 01 Title: The DNS Is Not Classy: DNS Classes Considered Useless Document date: 2016-03-04 Group: Individual Submission Pages: 7 URL: https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-sullivan-dns-class-useless-01.txt Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-sullivan-dns-class-useless/ Htmlized: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sullivan-dns-class-useless-01 Diff: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-sullivan-dns-class-useless-01 Abstract: Domain Name System Resource Records are identified in part by their class. The class field is not effective, and it is not used the way it appears to have been intended. This memo makes no recommendation about the DNS parameters registry, but urges those defining new RRTYPEs to define them for all classes. Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. The IETF Secretariat ----- End forwarded message ----- -- Andrew Sullivan a...@anvilwalrusden.com _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
