In message <20160316011219.gn89...@mx2.yitter.info>, Andrew Sullivan writes: > On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 10:01:21PM +0530, Mukund Sivaraman wrote: > > Added to that, the "A" record type is also found in some places with RR > > TYPE=1, with the same name "A" for the CH class, where it has a > > completely different RDATA format and meaning. It isn't listed on the > > DNS parameters page, but it is implemented so by BIND and you can find a > > description here: > > > > http://victor.se/bjorn/its/chaos-dns.php > > Wow. Well, that's helpful to know, so thanks. The fact that people > in the world are defining RRTYPEs in a class-dependent way without > putting anything in the registry is kinda awful, though. Certainly > another way in which classes appear to be loaded and aimed at feet. > Thanks for the reference!
It's more that the registry failed to scoop up all the old definitions. > A > > -- > Andrew Sullivan > a...@anvilwalrusden.com > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > DNSOP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: ma...@isc.org _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
