In message <20151111104833.gb29...@sources.org>, Stephane Bortzmeyer writes: > On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 03:25:11PM +0100, > Shane Kerr <sh...@time-travellers.org> wrote > a message of 49 lines which said: > > > My guess is that part of the resistance is because you are going to > > be asking people to spend money on something that does not provide > > them or their customers any (direct) benefits. Further, it breaks > > the registry-registrar model in some cases, where registries are > > kept away from registrants by a 1.6 km-high wall. > > +1 && +1 > > We at AFNIC have a long experience here since, during many years, we > requested successful technical checks before registering a domain (at > this time, there was no registration without delegation). It annoyed > people a lot and we got a reputation of pain-in-the-ass stupid french > people, always insisting on local and anti-american requirments (see > <http://www.circleid.com/posts/afnic_dns_server_redelegation/> for a > good example). > > I'm not eager to try it again, unless people pledge to support us > during flames on social networks.
Part of writing the I-D and trying to consensus through DNSOP rather than going as a I-S is to provide the a backstop for registries that check. The more registries that check the better for everyone. Support in numbers. -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: ma...@isc.org _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
