Moin!
On 8 Nov 2015, at 0:52, Mark Andrews wrote: > Fixing misimplementations of the protocol is different to fixing > misconfiguration of servers. The draft is aimed primarially at > fixing misimplementations rather than misconfigurations though both > need fixing. Sorry I over generalised. To the receiving end everything were one has to do something because of an unexpected result the work is the same. > As a vendor you (Nominum) should be checking the servers you ship > are compliant. If you find ones that are out of compliance you > should be fixing them and informing your customers that there are > fixed servers available. Compliance tests should be part of the > QA process. We do that, but we have lot more tests that make sure the server still works/resolves when someone on the authoritative side screwed up. So long -Ralf _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
