On 11 Nov 2015, at 7:47, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: > It may not be possible for everyone to agree on a comprehensive > set of 'wrongs' with no omissions, but it should be possible to > get consensus on a core set of 'wrongs' that are not controversial.
Yes and no. I think going for a minimum will be a good goal, but for example to have lame delegations must by definition be allowed, as some registration policies do require delegation (i.e. NS records). So people add NS records in parent zone, but nothing responds there. Until policy allows registration without delegation, you will see lame delegations. Patrik
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
