On 10/5/15, 9:37, "DNSOP on behalf of Tim Wicinski" <dnsop-boun...@ietf.org on behalf of tjw.i...@gmail.com> wrote:
>Could ICANN not document what they do now ? In there world of "there's so many things to do" - a few weeks back, off-list, there was a start of a discussion to alter the list of editors (namely, add me) of the draft. Aside - if I recall correctly, years ago, Joe announced the -00 as "what ICANN does" not something up for debate but something that would be ideal if the IETF had some comment on. (The new-fangled IETF archives don't seem to have an obvious way to look at messages from September 2010 or October 2010 when I suspect the mail triggering this idea arrived. If anyone knows where the old-hangled mailman archives are, it would be helpful.) I see this -11 document as something that can be an RFC, not a WG product. I.e., an individual submission with advice from the WG. The intent is to have an immutable, reviewed technical document published for the technical community. The RFC series seems appropriate. I could be wrong. My offer to be added as an editor was to take on any edits that might be needed. I don't know (off the top of my head) if any are. Perhaps it would be more useful to have a document shepherd than an editor to get this -11 into an RFC.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
