> Your co-chair is a little confused. Sorry about that.
On Oct 4, 2015, at 2:00 PM, David Conrad <d...@virtualized.org> wrote: >> I've since been told that the draft doesn't actually document current >> practice (don't know the details), so this probably needs to be fixed. > > What "needs to be fixed"? That the draft doesn't document current practice? Yes. I received a comment in response to my "+1" that the draft differs from current practice. I haven't had time to pursue the details, but wanted to flag this to indicate my "+1" was premature. I believe the document should reflect current practice. Regards, -drc
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
