Joe, On Mon, 28 Sep 2015 07:59:00 -0400 "Joe Abley" <jab...@hopcount.ca> wrote:
> I appreciate that the methods described in this document are not > universally liked. I have a feeling that we would get more discussion if > the question was more open-ended, e.g. how should trust anchors be > published? > > This document describes existing practice, and provides guidance for > people who need to bootstrap a validator using the mechanisms provided > by ICANN back in 2009/2010 when the root zone was first published. > > Here's a suggestion. If we were to consider publishing this document > as-is as a way of describing the current approach, we would at least > have a stable reference to the way we do things today. We could always > consider other approaches and, once implemented by ICANN, publish a new > document that obsoletes or updates this one. > > If that's an approach that people could stomach, then I would suggest > the next step is to WGLC this document and for those who would like to > propose different mechanisms to write them down. Given that this is supposed to turn into an informational RFC, and it provides information about how the IANA currently publishes trust anchors, I fully support it going forward as is. Cheers, -- Shane _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
