David Dagon writes: > I have some concerns, which I describe below. [...]
David, Thank you very much for your thoughtful comments. Broadly speaking, I very much agree with the bulk of them. Yet my current reaction is not to make any more alterations to the existing document. It describes the deployed protocol as-is, and your comments are appropriate for consideration for the revised protocol, where I can assure you they will definitely be integrated. Is there something specific about documenting (yet not endorsing) the in-use protocol that you think is important to get into the document before publication? _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
