On Sep 24, 2015, at 8:52 AM, John Dickinson <j...@sinodun.com> wrote: > I agree, when I last read this I had the IESG Note in my head (and I already > knew that this was just documenting existing deployments). Looking again, I > suggest that the IESG Note be moved to the main text and not be removed prior > to publication.
I think an IESG note is what happens when the authors don’t agree. In this case it sounds like Dave is on board with clarifying the applicability, and that seems like a much better outcome. (Thanks, Dave!)
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
