Hi Viktor, yes, we are waiting exactly for the cfrg to finish the signature schemas. But the rest can get a review early.
f.e. it's evident now, we have to add more material about motivation to add new curves into the draft(s). Cheers, Ondrej -- Ondřej Surý -- Technical Fellow -------------------------------------------- CZ.NIC, z.s.p.o. -- Laboratoře CZ.NIC Milesovska 5, 130 00 Praha 3, Czech Republic mailto:ondrej.s...@nic.cz https://nic.cz/ -------------------------------------------- ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Viktor Dukhovni" <ietf-d...@dukhovni.org> > To: dnsop@ietf.org > Sent: Wednesday, September 9, 2015 6:55:15 PM > Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notification for > draft-sury-dnskey-ed25519-03.txt > On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 11:19:13AM +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote: > >> Dear DNS colleagues, >> >> this might be of some interest to you. >> > > Thanks. Shouldn't this wait for the CFRG to finalize the new EC > signature schemes? We already have too many DNSSEC algorithm ids, > and are likely to add very similar code points once CFRG is done > RSN. > > So I'd prefer to see this delayed until the signature schemes for > the new CFRG curves are done. > > -- > Viktor. > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > DNSOP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
