Mark, On Jul 11, 2015, at 3:52 PM, Mark Andrews <ma...@isc.org> wrote: >>> This is why you have working groups not check lists for evaluating. >> >> RFC 6761 specifies an IETF "Standards Action" or "IESG Approval", not a >> working group decision. > > That why we have groups of people look at the request. Not a > individual working off a checklist. Attempting to get this sort > of assignment down to a simple checklist / objective measurements > will not work.
Because? In large part, I believe a simply set of criteria/objective measurements can be established that will allow the majority of proposed special name cases to be resolved with no contention. I would agree that there will always be borderline cases that need human intervention, but even then, there needs to be _some_ criteria by which the humans can judge. Regards, -drc
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
