Andrew, On Jul 10, 2015, at 5:52 AM, Andrew Sullivan <a...@anvilwalrusden.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at 03:53:22PM +0000, Alain Durand wrote: >> >> - RFC6761 does not say anything wrt to coordination between IETF and ICANN >> on this topic. > > Or with regard to co-ordination between anyone else and the IETF.
True, but the IETF hasn't entered into an MoU with anyone else on this particular topic. > This is part of why I say the IETF retains the ability to take some > names out of the DNS protocol or otherwise to alter the DNS namespace. I don't think there is any argument about this. The question is really about the criteria, constraints, and how coordination will be done since the implication of the special names registry is that it pushes the "single root" of the namespace up one level. >> - RFC6761 does not say much about how to evaluate the merits of proposals. > > I don't think that's true at all. It has the various criteria. If > you can't explain how you meet the various criteria, then there's a > problem. Wrong actor. Alain said 'evaluate' (which I take to mean how does the IETF/IESG/community interpret the input provided related to the criteria in 6761), not 'explain' (which I take to mean how does the requester attempt to describe how they meet the criteria). Regards, -drc
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
