Paul Hoffman <paul.hoff...@vpnc.org> wrote: > > Regarding specific definitions, what about my suggestions under "more > > definitions" at > > http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/current/msg14243.html > > Some of those definitions were speculative, and I think it is better to > defer them.
All of the definitions were based on quotes from RFCs, apart from "iterative query" (which has an illustrative citation) and "resolution" which is pervasive but never defined because it has an obvious grammatical link to "resolver". > >>> The definition of "authoritative data" is still wrong. > >> > >> We have done the best we can with this, given that RFC 1034's definition > >> is in dispute. > > > > I thought we had cleared it up. Why not adopt my corrected definition at > > http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/current/msg14243.html ? > > There was disagreement on the list about your statement: > > In RFC 1034, zone cuts are clearly defined to occur between labels, above > each delegation point, so it is correct to define authoritative data as > being above the zone cut, and this unambiguously excludes delegation NS > RRsets. Do you have a link? I didn't see any replies to my message. Tony. -- f.anthony.n.finch <d...@dotat.at> http://dotat.at/ Forties, Cromarty, Forth, Tyne, Dogger: Variable 3 or 4, becoming southwest 4 or 5, occasionally 6 later. Moderate in Forties, otherwise slight or moderate. Occasional rain. Good, occasionally poor later. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
