On 05/06/2015 17:50, Paul Hoffman wrote:
Thanks again for the in-depth review. A few comments below.
On Jun 4, 2015, at 5:35 PM, Tony Finch <d...@dotat.at> wrote:
The definition of "authoritative data" is still wrong.
We have done the best we can with this, given that RFC 1034's definition is in
dispute.
Typo: I think you mean parent-side not parent-size.
A few other things that have confused me in the past:
In-bailiwick: Informal discussion (in the bar at IETF meetings) suggests
to me that most people are confused by this term. To me and about 50% of
the people I have asked it means "Data for which the server is
authoritative and *not* data for which the server is an authoritative
ancestor". To me that is more in keeping with the dictionary definition
of bailiwick. However, at least 50% of people in the bar felt
differently. IMHO I think this is a term that should be deprecated and
replaced by "in zone" or "in domain".
Some RR types are described as "class independent" (See RFC4034) I am
not sure of the exact meaning of this (despite Roy's attempts to educate
me) and would like to see it defined here.
Also mention of A-Label, U-Label any other IDN terminology might be useful.
regards
John
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
