On Thu, 30 Apr 2015 15:35:31 +0100, Andrew Sullivan wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 07:28:21PM +0000, Edward Lewis wrote: > > > Vice versa, once the parent removes > > the NS set, the delegation is removed regardless of what the child > > "thinks." > > Well, effectively maybe not. If a resolver "sticks" on the child, > then the delegation won't move regardless.
ISTM that in such a case, the resolver is ignoring the updated/(re)moved delegation, rather than that the delegation hasn't moved. Niall O'Reilly _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
