On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 1:38 PM, Edward Lewis <edward.le...@icann.org> wrote:

> So, it's important to come to a common set of terminology which reflects
> how we understand the DNS to be built today, less important to rectify this
> with the past documents.
>

...except we're referencing those documents heavily to build the common set
of terminology (e.g., the hoffman draft).


> Don't take this as me saying "I'm right you rascal, now get off the porch"
> but to find consensus today rather than worry too much about immutable
> documents.
>

Whether or not errata(s) or clarification(s) are warranted, based on my
readings/confusion, I find the discussion useful to come to "terms".

Casey
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to