> Andrew Sullivan <mailto:a...@anvilwalrusden.com> > Thursday, March 19, 2015 3:56 AM > > No RFC can make changes that apply to implementations that do not > conform with that RFC. This is true by definition. The draft does > not somehow magically retroactively change the text in RFC 1035. It > specifies new behaviour, and old implementations that don't conform to > this new text will therefore obviously not exhibit the new behaviour. > What's the problem?
the problem is that the definition of DNS doesn't change incompatibly. if you want new behaviour, negotiate for it. -- Paul Vixie
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
