On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 10:08:23AM +0000, Tony Finch wrote: > I think the recommended limits in that paragraph are OK only if viewed > from the perspective of individual client programs. The above quote is > correct in that there's no sensible way for the server to enforce the > limit - never mind NAT, if a user starts up a second browser, will it be > locked out of TCP queries until the first one closes its connection?
I agree with this; it's only the MUST NOT that I think goes too far, since that's a restriction on what an implementation might offer. I like the proposed alternative text (which I elided). A -- Andrew Sullivan a...@anvilwalrusden.com _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
