On Nov 5, 2014, at 3:59 PM, Andrew Sullivan <a...@anvilwalrusden.com> wrote: > AFAIK we were planning only for informational. The chairs called > WGLC, it ran, there was some ranting, then some months later one of > the chairs told me that they weren't sure what to do. To publish > something as a WG document, you still need consensus to get it out of > the group.
Consensus in a case like this would mean "is there something in the document that is not correct," not "does everybody think we should publish the document." It is up to the chairs to determine consensus, and I think Pete's document (informative though it may be) on consensus is a perfectly valid guide for the chairs to follow in making that determination. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
