> Andrew Sullivan <mailto:a...@anvilwalrusden.com> > Wednesday, November 05, 2014 10:50 AM > On Wed, Nov 05, 2014 at 10:19:59AM -0800, 神明達哉 wrote: >> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dnsop-reverse-mapping-considerations-06 > ... > ... I believed I had watered down the draft so thoroughly that it > would be impossible for anyone to disagree with it. I was evidently > wrong. If we're going to bring that thing back up (in any sense you > like), then I think it needs to get a spine. Perhaps also my > willingness to try to find consensus has declined in the intervening > years: I just don't think there _is_ a consensus on this. the lack of consensus means it can't be a proposed standard, not that it can't be an FYI, BCP or similar, right?
the fact of the network is, without a PTR you will have a hard time originating TCP/25. we should say that. another fact is, not everyone who should be able to (non-maliciously) access your web service will have a PTR. we should say that, too. those aren't opinions and they shouldn't be controversial. -- Paul Vixie
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
