On Friday, October 31, 2014, Andrew Sullivan <a...@anvilwalrusden.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 05:28:40PM +0100, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > > something that is "against the rules laid out by the standard". > > "Nonconforming", then. Nonconformant or noncompliant ((as previously suggested) does not comply with the standard) > I have to agree that "illegal" is wrong. > There are no DNS cops, despite what many people would like. > > Oh, I thought that was Mark... :-) And I'd happily volunteer if we form a larger force - "he carries a badge, and a copy of Wireshark -- he's Warren, a member of the elite DNS branch of the Protocol Police. Sworn to uphold EDNS compliance and seek out broken delegations wherever they may be..." W > A > > -- > Andrew Sullivan > a...@anvilwalrusden.com <javascript:;> > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > DNSOP@ietf.org <javascript:;> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop > -- I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad idea in the first place. This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair of pants. ---maf
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
