On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 10:53 AM, Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzme...@nic.fr> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 06:09:49PM -0400, > Warren Kumari <war...@kumari.net> wrote > a message of 69 lines which said: > >> wkumari@vimes:~$ dig ns +noall +comments com.akadns.net > > [Example of a nameservcer replying NXDOMAIN for an ENT.]
Yes, I'm just surprised that Akamai suffers from it. > >> Er... wouldn't this break with qnm? > > Depending on how it is implemented, yes, may be, or no. Remember that > QNAME m12n is not a protocol but a general principle, that different > resolvers may implement slightly differently. > >> It has been a long day, so perhaps I'm missing something as well... > > The issue is described in draft-vixie-dnsext-resimprove-00 (section 3) > and partially in draft-ietf-dnsop-qname-minimisation-00 (section 3). Yup. Just expected better from akamai. -- I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad idea in the first place. This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair of pants. ---maf _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
