On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 06:09:49PM -0400, Warren Kumari <war...@kumari.net> wrote a message of 69 lines which said:
> wkumari@vimes:~$ dig ns +noall +comments com.akadns.net [Example of a nameservcer replying NXDOMAIN for an ENT.] > Er... wouldn't this break with qnm? Depending on how it is implemented, yes, may be, or no. Remember that QNAME m12n is not a protocol but a general principle, that different resolvers may implement slightly differently. > It has been a long day, so perhaps I'm missing something as well... The issue is described in draft-vixie-dnsext-resimprove-00 (section 3) and partially in draft-ietf-dnsop-qname-minimisation-00 (section 3). _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
