On 21.05.2014 12:08, Masataka Ohta wrote:
Klaus Malorny wrote:
please take into account that a CNAME + DNAME, the previously discussed
BNAME or the now discussed ENAME solution is still interesting for
domain name registries that have to deal with (maybe lots of) IDN
variants.
Scalability of IDN labels of equivalent characters is exponential.
Sure, but I am talking of about 5-20 variants per name, not all that are
combinatorially possible.
Thus, the only solution against it is to give it up.
Not yet ;-)
Regards,
Klaus
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
