Klaus Malorny wrote: > please take into account that a CNAME + DNAME, the previously discussed > BNAME or the now discussed ENAME solution is still interesting for > domain name registries that have to deal with (maybe lots of) IDN > variants.
Scalability of IDN labels of equivalent characters is exponential. Thus, the only solution against it is to give it up. Masataka Ohta\ _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop