On 4.4.2014 00:42, Paul Hoffman wrote:
On Apr 3, 2014, at 2:50 PM, Andrew Sullivan<a...@anvilwalrusden.com> wrote:
>On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 05:39:58PM -0400, Suzanne Woolf wrote:
>
>> operated on Internet networks. This will include root zone
>> name servers, TLD name servers, name servers for other DNS
>> zones, iterative DNS resolvers, and recursive DNS resolvers.
>
>Is there a reason to call out these particular functions, or not to
>include something like, "or any other resolver or server functioning
>as part of the global DNS"? I'm just worried, for instance, that
>stubs don't appear there, even though there might be advice I can
>imagine the WG providing.
+1 to at least calling out stub resolvers, but Andrew's non-list formulation is
better.
I agree that including stub-resolvers and other DNS-related software sounds
like a good idea.
There were long threads about DNSSEC handling in stub-resolvers on dane-list
[0] but dnsop seems like a better place to discuss this matter.
Note that this discussion is not over so we can move it to dnsop if dnsop
agrees.
[0] http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dane/current/msg06658.html
--
Petr Spacek @ Red Hat
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
