On 4 Feb 2014, at 01:21, Andrew Sullivan <a...@anvilwalrusden.com> wrote:

>    If you want to use a name in DNS protocol slots, then you need a DNS
>    name.  You didn't get a DNS name, and instead you used a label
>    that wasn't under your control.  That's been against the rules in the
>    DNS since forever.  Now you want to short-circuit the allocation
>    mechanism.  But we have an allocation mechanism for this.  In the
>    normal case, you apply to ICANN.  In an unusual case where the
>    protocol depends on this, then you can use this special-use
>    registry.  So you need to show that your protocol needs to depend
>    on this special-use label, and then we can register it under the
>    special use mechanism.  Otherwise go to ICANN.

+100.

I hope everyone here can agree on the above and we get back to discussing the 
actual draft.

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to