On 4 Feb 2014, at 01:21, Andrew Sullivan <a...@anvilwalrusden.com> wrote:
> If you want to use a name in DNS protocol slots, then you need a DNS > name. You didn't get a DNS name, and instead you used a label > that wasn't under your control. That's been against the rules in the > DNS since forever. Now you want to short-circuit the allocation > mechanism. But we have an allocation mechanism for this. In the > normal case, you apply to ICANN. In an unusual case where the > protocol depends on this, then you can use this special-use > registry. So you need to show that your protocol needs to depend > on this special-use label, and then we can register it under the > special use mechanism. Otherwise go to ICANN. +100. I hope everyone here can agree on the above and we get back to discussing the actual draft. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
