On Dec 3, 2013, at 5:20 PM, Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzme...@nic.fr> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 01:13:26PM -0500, > Warren Kumari <war...@kumari.net> wrote > a message of 35 lines which said: > >>> OK. And do note "chaff" may be a by-product of >>> draft-wkumari-dnsop-hammer. >> >> Um, please explain. >> >> Hammer (and the various similar, actually implemented things) simply >> trigger lookups a few seconds before the TTL would naturally expire >> *in response to an incoming query*. > > OK, I was too fast, sorry. Hammer itself does not scramble the stream > of requests. So, I withdraw the reference to Hammer. > Okey dokey (and the hackles go down :-P) > Still, sending gratuitous queries, without an incoming query and > without waiting for the expiration, may be a good strategy for a > resolver to make traffic analysis more difficult for the eavesdropper > (or for the authoritative name servers). > -- The plural of anecdote is not evidence. -- Bill Lockyer, California Attorney General _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop