On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 07:29:05AM -0800, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoff...@vpnc.org> wrote a message of 29 lines which said:
> The only possible outcome of people agreeing that there should be > more privacy for DNS queries and responses will be protocol changes. I disagree. If you read the version -00, you will see that the change proposed in section 5.2.2 is *not* a change in protocol but an unilateral action by the resolvers. Other changes may also be seen as unilateral action not requiring a protocol change (sending gratuitous queries to defeat traffic analysis, for instance). > Further, the vast majority of DNS queries are made by applications, > not directly by people. I do not see your point. When I click on http://www.playboy.com/, the request may be done by an application but it has certainly a relationship with a person, the user. > My first pass skim results in "this is a very solid starting point; > it needs a bit more meat; Can you explain in what parts? I'm willing to write more but I don't want to increase the size of the draft just to make it more impressive :-) _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
