On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 10:50:35AM -0500, Warren Kumari <war...@kumari.net> wrote a message of 88 lines which said:
> And I would like .pony as well please. > > The concern that we run into is deciding where to draw the line -- > can I just start using .wkumari in some random namespace and ask for > it to be reserved? Apple did it for .local, you're welcome to do the same. RFC 6761 do not seem to describe criterias for accepting/rejecting special TLD registrations. If one were to ask, for instance, proofs of actual deployment, .onion would provide them easily and .pony could not. > Either these are "real" DNS names and should follow the "normal" DNS > process (whether or not we like that process), or they are not, and > don't really belong in the DNS. Noone talked about the DNS. Like the mDNS of .local, they are different protocols and that's why they require special TLD. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
