On Dec 2, 2013, at 4:56 AM, Marco Davids (SIDN) <marco.dav...@sidn.nl> wrote:
> On 12/01/13 17:48, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > >> For the record, I've reviewed >> draft-grothoff-iesg-special-use-p2p-names-00, I find it well-written >> and clear and I fully support it. Registering these names would be a >> very good idea. > > Would it be worthwhile to add .bit to the list (Namecoin)? And I would like .pony as well please. The concern that we run into is deciding where to draw the line -- can I just start using .wkumari in some random namespace and ask for it to be reserved? Either these are "real" DNS names and should follow the "normal" DNS process (whether or not we like that process), or they are not, and don't really belong in the DNS. I get that there are some "special cases" -- would it be feasible to reserve *one* name (.p2p? .namespace?) and have things like this migrate over time under names within that? (.gnu.namespace)? Or simply move these under some existing namespace. W > > -- > Marco > > > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > DNSOP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop -- No man is an island, But if you take a bunch of dead guys and tie them together, they make a pretty good raft. --Anon.
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
