On Nov 27, 2013, at 3:40 AM, Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzme...@nic.fr> wrote:
> After discussion with the relevant ADs, it seems this Internet-Draft > is more for this working group. Could those relevant ADs maybe say why? If it is because "it's the last WG standing that has 'DNS' in its title", that seems particularly inappropriate in this case. The only possible outcome of people agreeing that there should be more privacy for DNS queries and responses will be protocol changes. Further, the vast majority of DNS queries are made by applications, not directly by people. Given those two, the privacy implications of DNS should be discussed (and even acted on, if we are lucky) in the Applications Area. If I got this all wrong, can you say which part of DNS operations is affected by the privacy issues? > So reading and advices are welcome. I > see several possible outcomes but I let you talk first :-) My first pass skim results in "this is a very solid starting point; it needs a bit more meat; thank you for doing this as a draft and not just a thread on perpass that will get lost". --Paul Hoffman _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
