On Feb 14, 2012, at 6:17 AM, Edward Lewis wrote: > At 21:39 +0000 2/9/12, <bmann...@vacation.karoshi.com> wrote: >> Is your opinion / argument strong enough to stop work on this draft? > As David says, why is this document being republished?
A question I'll note has not been answered. > My concern is that future RFPs and contracts will cite this as a document to > comply with. Agreed. A BCP on how best to provide a highly resilient DNS service would probably be useful. The document in question isn't close. At best, it feels like a bit of self-congradulatory back-patting for those root server operators that actually come close to what the document describes. At worst, it can be seen as an attempt at obfuscation of the fact that the root server operators (with one notable exception) are _NOT_ subject to RFPs, contracts, or any other form of enforcement. >> That said, I'd love to see a revamped version, if you have the time to >> copy-edit/reorgnize the document. > I do not recommend publishing the document as is. +1 Regards, -drc _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
