On Sep 27, 2011, at 2:21 PM, Edward Lewis wrote:

> At 13:53 -0400 9/27/11, Joe Abley wrote:
>> Not very useful for Neustar, maybe, but I would suggest that your
>> requirements in this regard are likely not to be universal.
> 
> No argument with that.  But since the question was asked...  What I meant is 
> that although there are places that will want to implement this, there are 
> many that won't, including us.  (Lecture on internal monitoring, et.al., 
> elided.)
> 
> I'd have to say that it has been a long time since there was a trouble ticket 
> that needed to know which any cast instance was being hit by the user.
> 
> There's nothing wrong with anyone implementing this.  But whether this is a 
> DNSOP WG item rests on how broad the interest is

I for one am interested and willing to work on this (responding for bean 
counting..)

> and if there's a need to coordinate for interoperability reasons.
> 
>> We respond honestly to queries for HOSTNAME.BIND, VERSION.BIND, ID.SERVER,
>> VERSION.SERVER as well as RFC5001/NSID on L-Root, for example.
> 
> It's not a matter of honesty.
> 
> -- 
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> Edward Lewis
> NeuStar                    You can leave a voice message at +1-571-434-5468
> 
> Vote for the word of the day:
> "Papa"razzi - father that constantly takes photos of the baby
> Corpureaucracy - The institution of corporate "red tape"
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
> 

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to