On 2010-03-09, at 11:59, Tony Finch wrote: > On Tue, 9 Mar 2010, Matt Larson wrote: >> >> Even after .net is signed (in Q4 2010) > > I note that Verisign's press releases say "by Q1 2011" which I find rather > hard to interpret. Why don't they say "by the start of 2011"? Do they mean > "in Q1 2011"?
It's possible you're making assumptions about VeriSign's fiscal year-end. I've always understood "Q1" to mean "within the first quarter of the fiscal year" which will only map to January-March for companies whose year end is 31 December. Perhaps VeriSign meant something different, however. >> There is definitely a trade-off between increased response size and the >> incremental benefits of signing that needs to be weighed and evaluated. > > In what situations is the larger response size a problem for > root-servers.net? Why isn't it a problem for any other domain? The lack of clear answers to such questions to me is an indication that care is needed. Joe _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
