On Tue, 9 Mar 2010, Matt Larson wrote: > > Even after .net is signed (in Q4 2010)
I note that Verisign's press releases say "by Q1 2011" which I find rather hard to interpret. Why don't they say "by the start of 2011"? Do they mean "in Q1 2011"? People on Twitter have been saying today that Verisign are planning to sign "during the first half of 2011" though the link they are pointing to says "by the first half of 2011". http://searchsecurity.techtarget.com/video/0,297151,sid14_gci1411162,00.html?track=sy160 What is the date of the actual deployment deadline? > There is definitely a trade-off between increased response size and the > incremental benefits of signing that needs to be weighed and evaluated. In what situations is the larger response size a problem for root-servers.net? Why isn't it a problem for any other domain? Tony. -- f.anthony.n.finch <d...@dotat.at> http://dotat.at/ GERMAN BIGHT HUMBER: SOUTHWEST 5 TO 7. MODERATE OR ROUGH. SQUALLY SHOWERS. MODERATE OR GOOD. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
