On Thu, 25 Feb 2010, Tony Finch wrote:
What are the arguments against using somthing like RFC 5011 to automatically update DS records? (If you can do that I suppose you could update the rest of the delegation too.)
"Timers vs Triggers". Look through the archive. In short, RFC5011 puts the error of not catching up at the parent. Lawyers (and some TLDs) don't like that, and prefer children push updates to the parent instead. Paul _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
