At 8:18 PM +0000 1/22/10, bmann...@vacation.karoshi.com wrote: >On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 09:13:22AM -0800, Paul Hoffman wrote: >> At 4:56 PM +0000 1/22/10, Tony Finch wrote: >> >On Thu, 21 Jan 2010, Paul Hoffman wrote: >> >> >> >> - Regular rolling can give you a false sense of security about your >> >> rolling process >> > >> >How can you have any sense of security about your rolling process if you >> >don't exercise it? >> >> Why do people think the opposite of "regular" is "never"? >> >> --Paul Hoffman, Director > > > to borrow from Andrew - let me posit an analogy... > > would you rather have your LASIX or LIOP surgery done > by someone who has done 12,000 such procedures and > does a couple a week or someone who has done a dozen > and does them about every couple years or so? > > sure, the doctor who does them all the time -might- get > sloppy and cut corners -- but is that worse than someone > who has only passing understanding of what they are actually > doing? > > the risk isn't -never-, the risk is lack of experience.
Why do people think this is about "the risk" instead of "the risks"? --Paul Hoffman, Director --VPN Consortium _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
