On Apr 23, 2009, at 5:34 AM, Shane Kerr wrote:
Not really true. Many people think that the validating resolver should
be on the host itself.
Many?  I can only dream.

This would use DNSSEC to secure even the last mile.
Presumably it would still forward queries to a nearby recursive
resolver, so there would be some shared caching going on?
You could do that, sure.  It would be a reasonable optimization, but I  
don't expect it actually necessary (one could look at the amount of  
crap hitting the root servers). However the point is that you need to  
do the validation someplace you can talk securely to.  The easiest  
answer is to simply do the validation on the same host.
I figure stub resolvers were needed when cpu/bandwidth/memory were a  
bit more expensive than now.  It seems a shame to constrain our  
architecture to the '80s...
Regards,
-drc




_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to