Wouter, W.C.A. Wijngaards wrote: > Shane Kerr wrote: >> Presumably it would still forward queries to a nearby recursive >> resolver, so there would be some shared caching going on? > >> Has anybody ever written this down anywhere? (Sorry if I missed it.) > > It is called a validating stub.
Okay, that's defined in RFC 4033, but has anybody ever written down that this is the way everybody should do DNSSEC from now on? I also didn't see anything about caching behavior in RFC 4033, but I admit I might have missed it. Cheers, -- Shane _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
