On Apr 14, 2009, at 6:57 AM, Paul Vixie wrote:

An alternative would be to require MX records to assert SMTP service. A positive assertion will not impose additional burdens on root servers, but will necessitate explicit DNS provisions to exchange SMTP messages. With 19 out of 20 messages being abusive and largely from compromised systems, requiring a domain to assert their intent to exchange public SMTP messages will encourage adoption without burdening root servers with strategies sure to generate extraneous traffic beyond their control.

this also worries me since it makes good mail less deliverable as the cost of stopping blowback, and it won't slow bad mail down at all.


Reverse DNS could be placed in the same category. Reverse DNS is not well supported on some networks. Resulting DNS timeouts reduces MTAs resources and can lead to chronic unseen failures to connect. This does cause the loss of good email.

A domain might make exceptions to a MUST HAVE MX RR rule at their MTA that is receiving messages from systems they monitor whenever adding an MX RR for the domain would otherwise attract undesired email abuse. With a required MX RR convention, not publishing the MX record will offer greater protection from abuse for all hosts that publish IP address records in DNS. As IPv6 becomes more widely used and Internet use becomes more diversified, more embedded devices and networks may be unable to endure the typical email abuse caused by backscatter or various checks made in an effort to determine whether a domain accepts the SMTP message traffic.

A required MX RR rule answers the question of SMTP exchange without burdening either uninvolved hosts or roots. This rule may become a necessity in response to poorly considered tactics often used to defend MTAs from abuse. Passing email's burdens onto otherwise uninvolved systems will not better defend the Internet. Publishing an MX record would be a minor step toward increased protections and in ensuring email delivery which most domains have already taken.

-Doug

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to