At 07:23 10-04-2009, OndÅej Surý wrote:
Since it looks like it is already in use (at
least in some MTAs) I am willing to help
to standardize this. However I lack an
experience what to do if there is no smtp
working group. Should I send it to apps area ml, or to chairs of apps area?
You can use the "historical" SMTP mailing list
(ietf-s...@imc.org) to discuss about the
draft. You might want to ask DNSOP to review the draft first.
It seems to be overkill to start whole wg just
to standardize one draft, isn't it?
In this case, yes.
At 08:41 10-04-2009, Edward Lewis wrote:
Until the post, no one brought this to the WG's attention.
This message (
http://www.ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/namedroppers.2005/msg00944.html
) and some other messages on the ietf-smtp
mailing list could be read as a lack of support for the draft.
At 12:12 10-04-2009, Alfred =?hp-roman8?B?SM5uZXM=?= wrote:
That list has been used for the development of RFC 5321 and it is
going to be used for the desired Full Standard successor of it,
No, that's going to be done on another mailing list once the WG is chartered.
Regards,
-sm
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
