On Tue, 1 Apr 2008, Sebastian Castro wrote: > So the data seems to be useful (but not complete). Once we got all the > data for DITL 2008 we could try to run the same test and look for > trends.
But it is a good start in having a look at the problem (or if anyone could consider to be a problem). I suppose I should dust off my notes on this issue and hammer something out, as there were some on this list who were interested in seeing a proposal. Mind you, I wonder if the WG might be out of scope for dealing with 'junk' TLD. wfms _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
