On Tue, 4 Dec 2007, Edward Lewis wrote:
At 12:57 -0800 12/3/07, Brian Dickson wrote:
What are the pros/cons of this, other than the obvious offloading
of junk TLD lookups?
From http://www.nanog.org/mtg-0310/pdf/wessels.pdf:
Yes I remember that presentation. I think John Crain's posting (thanks to
Stephane for pointing that out) is pretty timely (in more than one way).
I'd be happy to write-up an ID describing the problem and proposing AS112
as a potential solution - I don't want to fiddle with the current AS112
drafts. Further proposed delegations of anything is probably best to
bash separately (which is what is taking place now).
Testing the waters a bit over delegations, I was told in the hallway that
getting a junk TLD delegation is far harder than compared to a reverse
map. (They did not elaborate.)
All said though, it would be nice to hear from other root server operators
just to correlate data regarding junk TLDs (unless someone like CAIDA
might already have data like this around, just not really noted).
wfms
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
