On Jun 6, 2023, at 8:42 PM, Rob Sayre <say...@gmail.com> wrote:



Caution: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click 
links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content 
is safe.


On Tue, Jun 6, 2023 at 11:23 AM Hollenbeck, Scott 
<shollenbeck=40verisign....@dmarc.ietf.org<mailto:40verisign....@dmarc.ietf.org>>
 wrote:
Measurement of CPU and memory use between Do53 and DoT or DoQ.
Measurement of query response rates between Do53 and DoT or DoQ.
Measurement of server authentication successes and failures.
Measurement and descriptions of observed attack traffic, if any.

Hi,

I don't think this kind of argument is reasonable. Just let them propose a 
standard. There is nothing requiring anyone to implement it, as the IETF has no 
enforcement function.

[SAH] It would be unreasonable if we were discussing a proposal that had no 
impact on root and TLD name servers. Under some conditions, this proposal can 
affect their ability to perform their primary function of responding to DNS 
queries. Those conditions need to be understood. Additionally, some of the 
operators of those services are subject to regulators who commonly require them 
to implement, deploy, and operate IETF standards. That’s another good reason to 
do our best to understand the operational impact before this becomes a proposed 
standard.

Scott
_______________________________________________
dns-privacy mailing list
dns-privacy@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy

Reply via email to