On Jun 5, 2023, at 8:12 PM, Brian Haberman <br...@innovationslab.net> wrote: > > Tim & I checked in with our AD on this. Given that the charter text calls out > Experimental, that is a binding agreement with the IESG. > > Our choices are simple: > > 1) publish as Experimental > 2) re-charter > > If the intended status had just been in the milestones, we would have more > flexibility. > > Let’s constructively discuss the above options.
One large problem with publishing a protocol as "experimental" is there is not objective way to exit that status. There are no criteria that say "this experiment succeeded" or "this experiment failed". It will take much less IETF effort to fix the charter now than it will to move the already-deployed protocol to standards track. We might as well bit the bureaucratic bullet now and just fix the charter. If most folks agree, I can do that work. --Paul Hoffman _______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list dns-privacy@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
